EXEMPLAR · INNORVE-METHOD-EXEMPLARAPACHE 2.0 · v0.1 · APRIL 2026
The first public exemplar

Vendor-Risk Review Assistant.
All eight frameworks. One synthetic scenario.

A complete, end-to-end demonstration of the Innorve Method applied to a fictional mid-sized financial services firm. Every framework is operationalized as a real artifact you can read, copy, and adapt to your own work.

The scenario

Northstar Systems, Inc. is a fictional mid-sized financial services firm building a Vendor-Risk Review Assistant. The assistant ingests a vendor's SOC 2 report, their data-processing addendum, and a brief risk questionnaire. It produces a draft risk assessment, a recommended set of compensating controls, and a decision record routed for human approval.

The scenario was chosen because every regulated organization has vendors and vendor risk; it naturally exercises all eight Innorve Method frameworks; and the data is straightforward to keep entirely synthetic.

⚠ Everything in this exemplar is fictional. Northstar Systems is not a real company. The vendors, the assessments, the controls, and the audit logs are all invented for demonstration. Domains use the reserved .example TLD throughout. Do not use these artifacts as legal, compliance, or risk-management advice.
Framework-by-framework tour

What's in the repo, and why each piece is there.

Eight frameworks. Eight named artifacts. Read them in order, or skip to the one nearest your current work.

IM-01

Skill Architecture Patterns

The vendor-risk workflow is decomposed into three composable skills: classify the document, assess the risk, recommend the controls. Each is independently testable.

Evidence: scenarios/vendor-risk-review/skill-graph.md

IM-02

Policy-as-Code

A single YAML policy declares who can invoke each skill, on what data classes, with what approval thresholds, and which refusal modes are mandatory.

Evidence: policies/vendor-risk.policy.yaml

IM-03

Evidence-by-Design

Every invocation produces an audit log entry. The Governance Binder folder is populated from the first commit — model card, eval report, prompt register, risk register.

Evidence: governance/ + audit-trail/

IM-04

Skill Contract Schema

Three Skill Contracts (vendor-risk-assess, vendor-document-classify, vendor-control-recommend) with typed input/output, evidence requirements, refusal modes, and risk classes.

Evidence: contracts/vendor-risk-assess.yaml

IM-05

Maturity Gate Model

Two Maturity Gate Reports demonstrate the skill in two stages — Validated for the document classifier, Incubating for the higher-risk recommender — with explicit gate criteria.

Evidence: maturity-report/vendor-risk-assess-v0.2.yaml

IM-06

Capability Graph

The fictional vendor-risk function mapped across the seven SDLC phases in YAML and Mermaid. Shows where the skills fit and where capability is still absent.

Evidence: capability-graph/northstar-vendor-risk.yaml

IM-07

Tenant-Aware Design

Three Tenant Posture cards show the same skill posture-shifted for a startup tenant (lightweight), an enterprise tenant (formal), and a regulated tenant (strict + immutable evidence).

Evidence: tenant-postures/regulated-posture.md

IM-08

Multi-Tool Strategy

The model selection document declares a primary, a fallback, a fail-closed default, and the migration triggers that would cause a swap.

Evidence: multi-tool-decisions/model-selection.md

Repository structureinnorve-method-exemplar/
├── README.md — narrative explanation of architectural decisions
├── WHAT-THIS-IS.md — what to take from it, what to copy, what to ignore
├── WHAT-THIS-IS-NOT.md — guardrails on interpretation
├── contracts/ — Skill Contracts (IM-04)
├── policies/ — Policy-as-Code (IM-02)
├── evals/ — 15 cases (8 happy + 4 edge + 3 regression)
├── audit-trail/ — sample audit logs (IM-03)
├── governance/ — Governance Binder (IM-03)
├── capability-graph/ — graph in YAML + Mermaid (IM-06)
├── maturity-report/ — Maturity Gate Reports (IM-05)
├── tenant-postures/ — startup, enterprise, regulated cards (IM-07)
├── multi-tool-decisions/ — model + framework selection (IM-08)
├── scenarios/vendor-risk-review/ — skill graph + prompt register
└── docs/ — DEMO-SCRIPT, SCREENSHOTS

Read it, then write your own.

The fastest way to internalize the Method is to copy a starter from this exemplar, swap the scenario, and produce the next artifact yourself.

Cite this exemplar:Innorve Method Exemplar — Vendor-Risk Review Assistant (v0.1, 2026). Innorve Academy.
https://github.com/Innorve-Inc/innorve-method-exemplar
https://innorve.academy/exemplar